Publication: Sociología de la construcción de los conceptos académicos : El caso de la "diversidad" en educación
Authors
Jiménez Rodrigo, María Luisa ; Guzmán Ordaz, Raquel
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Murcia : Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Sociología y Trabajo Social
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
Este trabajo analiza los dispositivos de construcción del concepto “diversidad” en
el campo de la educación a partir del examen de los discursos académicos. Para
ello, se identifican las características de los agentes académicos que producen y
manejan los discursos, los procesos de heterodesignación que dicha noción
implica, así como los mecanismos objetivadores y legitimadores esgrimidos en las
apuestas discursivas dominantes. Se han recopilado y analizado 218 artículos
publicados en revistas científicas de Ciencias Sociales indexadas en CSIC-ISOC y
Dialnet entre 2006 y 2012. Los resultados indican: i) una monopolización
disciplinar de la diversidad por las Ciencias de la Educación; ii) los procesos de
heteroidentificación por parte de los agentes universitarios hacia el profesorado
preuniversitario y del alumnado categorizado como “diverso”; iii) dos enfoques
hegemónicos y en competencia sobre la diversidad, uno basado en las necesidades educativas específicas y otro en las diferencias culturales, aunque
convergentes en torno a la lógica pedagógica.
ABSTRACT The current paper focuses on the construction devices deployed in the conformation of the “diversity” concept drawing from the analysis of academic discourses. In so doing we identify agents´ features and their generation and control of discourses, heterodesignation processes implicit within those frameworks, as well as the objectivising and legitimising mechanisms set up in the predominant narratives, proceeding from the collection and analysis of 218 social science articles indexed in the data bases CSIC-ISOC and Dialnet between 2006 and 2012. The results show: i) “diversity” as a concept subjected to disciplinary monopolization by the university education departments; ii) university agents capability of heteroidentification towards non university educators and towards students defined as “diverse”; iii) two hegemonic but competing approaches in the diversity discourse, once built upon specific educational needs, the other structured around cultural differences, but both agree on the pedagogical logic
ABSTRACT The current paper focuses on the construction devices deployed in the conformation of the “diversity” concept drawing from the analysis of academic discourses. In so doing we identify agents´ features and their generation and control of discourses, heterodesignation processes implicit within those frameworks, as well as the objectivising and legitimising mechanisms set up in the predominant narratives, proceeding from the collection and analysis of 218 social science articles indexed in the data bases CSIC-ISOC and Dialnet between 2006 and 2012. The results show: i) “diversity” as a concept subjected to disciplinary monopolization by the university education departments; ii) university agents capability of heteroidentification towards non university educators and towards students defined as “diverse”; iii) two hegemonic but competing approaches in the diversity discourse, once built upon specific educational needs, the other structured around cultural differences, but both agree on the pedagogical logic
publication.page.subject
Citation
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Sin licencia Creative Commons.