Publication:
The 2-point method: A quick, accurate, and repeatable approach to estimate ultrasoundderived quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area

dc.contributor.authorHernández Belmonte, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Pallarés, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Cava, Alejandro
dc.contributor.departmentActividad Física y Deporte
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-09T07:52:50Z
dc.date.available2025-10-09T07:52:50Z
dc.date.copyright© 2022, Human Kinetics, Inc.
dc.date.issued2022-07-18
dc.descriptionVersión aceptada
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To analyze the feasibility of the 2-point method for estimating ultrasound-derived quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area (QUADACSA). First, (1) the agreement between QUADACSA measured by panoramic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was studied, and thereafter, we examined 2 approaches of the 2-point method in terms of (2) estimation errors and (3) test–retest repeatability. Methods: Both thighs of 16 young men were analyzed. Ultrasound-QUADACSA versus MRI-QUADACSA comparison was conducted at 6 thigh lengths (20%–70% of the thigh length). Thereafter, ultrasound-QUADACSA corresponding to 30% and 60% (2-point30%–60%) or 20% and 70% (2-point20%–70%) were used to estimate QUADACSA of the remaining regions. Estimated QUADACSA resulting from both 2-point approaches was compared with the measured one. Finally, the test–retest repeatability was examined by comparing the errors generated on 2 separate estimations. Statistics included the standard error of measurement (SEM) expressed in absolute (in square centimeters) and relative terms (in percentage) as a coefficient of variation (CV), as well as the intraclass correlation cofficient (ICC) and bias. Results: An excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.980) and reduced errors (SEM ≤ 2.43 cm2) resulted from the ultrasound-QUADACSA versus MRI-QUADACSA comparison. Although estimation errors found were reduced (CV ≤ 7.50%), they proved to be lower and less biased for the 2-point30%–60%, especially at the central regions (SEM ≤ 2.01 cm2; bias ≤ 0.89 cm2). Similarly, repeatability analysis revealed lower test–retest errors for the 2-point30%–60% (CV ≤ 1.9%) than for the 2-point20%–70% (CV ≤ 4.6%). Conclusion: The 2-point method, especially that implemented using the 30% and 60% regions, represents an accurate and repeatable strategy to evaluate QUADACSA.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.format.extent9
dc.identifier.citationInt J Sports Physiol Perform. 17(10):1480-1488
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2021-0381
dc.identifier.eissn1555-0273
dc.identifier.issn1555-0265
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/165369
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidad
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.humankinetics.com/view/journals/ijspp/17/10/article-p1480.xml
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectExtended field of view
dc.subjectHypertrophy
dc.subjectAtrophy
dc.subjectTesting
dc.subjectReliability
dc.subject.odsNo relacionado con ningún objetivo de desarrollo sostenible
dc.titleThe 2-point method: A quick, accurate, and repeatable approach to estimate ultrasoundderived quadriceps femoris cross-sectional area
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationa4bb5157-12e0-489d-8fb2-ff3b3d5a2c4d
relation.isAuthorOfPublication80de5692-18b8-43b2-a202-ae1faa96659c
relation.isAuthorOfPublication25b4cbcc-3ab8-47c6-b606-699ef6d3e50e
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverya4bb5157-12e0-489d-8fb2-ff3b3d5a2c4d
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
The 2-Point Method_A Quick, Accurate, and Repeatable Approach to Estimate Ultrasound-Derived Quadriceps Femoris Cross-Sectional Area.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.37 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections