Publication:
Comparison between efficacy of spinal mobilization with leg movement versus McKenzie technique in patients with lumbar disc herniation

dc.contributor.authorSelim, Mohammad N.
dc.contributor.authorMokhtar, Maha M.
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Mahmoud H.
dc.contributor.authorAbonour, Asmaa A.
dc.contributor.authorAbdelmutilibe, Sahar M.
dc.contributor.authorEssa, Mohamed M. M.
dc.coverage.spatialEl Cairo, Egiptoes
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-21T08:32:39Z
dc.date.available2023-04-21T08:32:39Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractBackground: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common causes of medical consultationin the orthopedic clinics. LDH is believed to be the root cause of 60-80 percent of low back pain cases over a lifetime. Objective: The current study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different dissimilar manual therapy techniques (Mulligan’s spinal mobilization with leg movement versus McKenzie technique) in patients with lumbar disc herniation.Design: The present study is a randomized control trial in which 45 individuals diagnosed with LDH were recruited as the participants of the study (mean age 48.54 ± 5.8 years). The participants were randomly allocated into three groups, with n=15 in each group. Intervention:Participants of the group A (Experimental group A) received Mulligan spinal mobilization with leg movement and T.E.N.S. (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation). Group B (Experimental group B) participants received McKenzietechnique. Group C (control group) participants only received T.E.N.S. for four weeks. All patients in the three groups received 3 sessions each week. Pain, functional disability, and the H reflex were the primary outcome measures. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain, the Oswestry disability scale was used to assess functional disability, and electromyography was used to assess the H reflex.Results: Significant improvements were seen in the participants of group A, with reduction in the intensity and severity of pain, decreased level of functional disability and improvement in the H reflex, in comparison with other groups.Conclusion: Spinal mobilization with leg movement was more effective than McKenzietechniqueand TENS to reduce pain and functional disability, and to improve the H reflex, in individuals suffering from lumbar disc herniationes
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent15es
dc.identifier.citationSPORT TK-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte, Vol 11 (2022): Suplemento 2es
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.522801
dc.identifier.issn2340-8812
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/130229
dc.languageenges
dc.publisherUniversidad de Murcia. Servicio de publicacioneses
dc.relationSin financiación externa a la Universidades
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectH reflexes
dc.subjectLumbar disc herniationes
dc.subjectMcKenziees
dc.subjectSpinal mobilization with leg movementes
dc.subject.otherCDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::61 - Medicina::612 - Fisiologíaes
dc.titleComparison between efficacy of spinal mobilization with leg movement versus McKenzie technique in patients with lumbar disc herniationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
522801-Texto del artículo-2053251-1-10-20230313.pdf
Size:
222.64 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.39 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: