Publication:
Properties of polyetheretheretherketone (PEEK) implant abutments: a systematic review

Thumbnail Image
Files
jced-14-e349.pdf(854.92 KB)
Date
2022-04
relationships.isAuthorOfPublication
relationships.isSecondaryAuthorOf
relationships.isDirectorOf
Authors
Ghazal Maghras, Romaisa ; Vilaplana Vivo, Jaime ; Camacho Alonso, Fabio ; Martínez Beneyto, Yolanda
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Medicina Oral S. L.
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59466
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
© 2022, Medicina Oral S. L. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. This document is the Published version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59466
Abstract
Background: The main objective of the present systematic review is to know the mechanical and functional properties of PEEK (polyetheretheretherketone) abutment and to find out if it is a potential substitute for titanium abutments. Material and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in 5 databases: Medline (Pubmed), SciELO, Cochrane, Web of Science (WOS) and Google Scholar. Studies published from 2018 to 2020 and written in English were included. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID 274834). ubsequently, data extraction and quality analysis were performed according to the modified CONSORT guidelines. Results: Initially, a total of 976 articles were obtained. Using Mendeley Desktop, duplicates were discarded, redu cing the number of articles to 483. After reading abstracts, 448 articles were excluded. Finally, 35 full-text articles were analysed, of which 5 articles were included in this systematic review. Conclusions: The available evidence shows that PEEK implant abutments do not have sufficient biomechanical requirements to replace the definitive titanium abutment. However, it is considered as an alternative and provisional material, especially if placed in the anterior region.
publication.page.subject
Abutment , Polyetheretheretherketone , Titanium , Dynamic fatigue , Fracture toughness , Loss of torque
Citation
Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e349–e358.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/10201/147833
item.page.embargo
Collections
Artículos
Ir a Estadísticas