Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.

Crespo, Susana; Cortés, Olga; García, Carlos; Pérez, Leonor

Publication:
Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.

dc.contributor.author	Crespo, Susana
dc.contributor.author	Cortés, Olga
dc.contributor.author	García, Carlos
dc.contributor.author	Pérez, Leonor
dc.contributor.department	Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.date.accessioned	2024-02-01T12:30:03Z
dc.date.available	2024-02-01T12:30:03Z
dc.date.issued	2008
dc.description	©2008. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by /4.0/ This document is the Published, version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. To access the final edited and published work see 10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576	es
dc.description.abstract	The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency in both, preparation time and root canal shape, when using the Nickel Titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary and K-Files hand instrumentation on root canal preparation of single rooted primary teeth. Material and methods: Sixty single rooted primary teeth were selected and divided into two equal groups: Group (1) 30 teeth instrumented with manual K- files and group (II) 30 teeth instrumented with Ni-Ti rotary files (ProFile 0.04). Instrumentation times were calculated and root canal impressions were taken with light bodied silicone in order to evaluate the shape. The data was analyzed with SPSS program using the t-test and the Chi-square test to compare their means. Results: The preparation time with group (I) K- files was significantly higher than ni group (II) rotary files (ProFile 0.04), with a=p .005. The ProFile system showed a significantly more favorable canal taper when compared to the K-files system (P= 002) Conclusions: The use o f rotary files in primary teeth has several advantages when compared with manual K files: the efficiency in both, preparation time and root canal shape. 1. A decreased working time, that helps maintain patient cooperation by diminishing the potential for tiredness. 2. The shape of the root canal is more conical, favoring a higher quality of the root canal filling, and increasing clinical success	es
dc.format	application/pdf	es
dc.format.extent	4	es
dc.identifier.citation	Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry 2008, 32: 295-298.
dc.identifier.doi	10.17796/jcpd.32.4.l57l36355u606576
dc.identifier.issn	1053-4628
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10201/138427
dc.language	eng	es
dc.relation	Sin financiación externa a la Universidad	es
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	es
dc.rights	Atribución 4.0 Internacional	*
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Rotary files	es
dc.subject	Primary teeth	es
dc.subject	K-files	es
dc.title	Comparison between rotary and manual instrumentation in primary teeth.	es
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	es
dspace.entity.type	Publication	es