Publication: Learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation theory with face-to- face versus audiovisual instruction for secondary school students: a randomized controlled trial
| dc.contributor.author | Cerezo Espinosa, Cristina | |
| dc.contributor.department | Didáctica de las Ciencias Matemáticas y Sociales | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Basic life support | es |
| dc.coverage.spatial | First aid | es |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Video | es |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Obligatory secondary education | es |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-24T12:46:15Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-03-24T12:46:15Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
| dc.description | © 2018 Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias This document is the published version of a published work that appeared in final form in Emergencias. . | es |
| dc.description.abstract | Objective. To compare secondary students’ learning of basic life support (BLS) theory and the use of an automatic external defibrillator (AED) through face-to-face classroom instruction versus educational video instruction. Methods. A total of 2225 secondary students from 15 schools were randomly assigned to one of the following 5 instructional groups: 1) face-to-face instruction with no audiovisual support, 2) face-to-face instruction with audiovisual support, 3) audiovisual instruction without face-to-face instruction, 4) audiovisual instruction with face-to-face instruction, and 5) a control group that received no instruction. The students took a test of BLS and AED theory before instruction, immediately after instruction, and 2 months later. Results. The median (interquartile range) scores overall were 2.33 (2.17) at baseline, 5.33 (4.66) immediately after instruction (P<.001) and 6.00 (3.33) (P<.001). All groups except the control group improved their scores. Scores immediately after instruction and 2 months later were statistically similar after all types of instruction. Conclusion. No significant differences between face-to-face instruction and audiovisual instruction for learning BLS and AED theory were found in secondary school students either immediately after instruction or 2 months later. Keywords: Basic life support. First aid. Video. Obligatory secondary education. | es |
| dc.format | application/pdf | es |
| dc.format.extent | 7 | es |
| dc.identifier.citation | Emergencias. 2018 30:28-34 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | Print.: 1137-6821 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | Electronic.: 2386-5857 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/152120 | |
| dc.language | eng | es |
| dc.publisher | Sociedad Española de Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias | es |
| dc.relation | Sin financiación externa a la Universidad | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess | |
| dc.title | Learning cardiopulmonary resuscitation theory with face-to- face versus audiovisual instruction for secondary school students: a randomized controlled trial | es |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | es |
Collections
Sin licencia Creative Commons.