Publication:
Primary stability and PES/WES evaluation for immediate implants in the aesthetic zone: a pilot clinical double-blind randomized study

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSanchez Perez, A. J.
dc.contributor.authorNicolás Silvente, Ana Isabel
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Matas, C.
dc.contributor.authorMolina-García, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorNavarro-Cuellar, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorRomanos, G.E.
dc.contributor.departmentDermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina Física
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-02T22:11:10Z
dc.date.available2022-05-02T22:11:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description© 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This document is the Published Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Scientific Reports. To access the final edited and published work see doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99218-8
dc.descriptionThe use of immediate implants in the aesthetic area is a technique widely used in modern implantology. The characteristics of the patient, the implant, and the surgical procedure used may influence the final results. The aim was to assess whether the implant design affects primary (P.S.) and secondary stability (S.S.), bone level (B.L.), and PES/WES evaluation. Twenty implants with two different designs (n = 10) were immediately placed and randomly located in the upper anterior maxilla with no grafting material. Implant-Stability-Quotient (ISQ), B.L., and Pink-Esthetic-Score/White-Esthetic-Score (PES/WES) were evaluated. Shapiro–Wilk normality test was performed to determine the sample normality, as the data did not follow a normal distribution, the Wilcoxon-Mann–Whitney test was applied (p < 0.05). ISQ was determined at placement (PS): control 59.1 (C.I.54.8–63.3); experimental 62.2(C.I.60.1–64.2) and three months after placement (SS): control 62.2.1 (C.I.53.3–71.0); experimental 67.2(C.I.65.8–68.5). The BL was measured at three months after placement: control 0.38 mm (C.I.− 0.06 to + 0.83); experimental 0.76 mm (C.I.0.33–1.19) and at 12 months post-loading: control 0.07 mm (C.I.− 0.50–0.65); experimental 0.90 mm (C.I.0.38–1.42). PES/WES values were evaluated for the control group: 15 (C.I.12.68–17.32), and for the experimental group 15.20 (C.I.11.99–18.41). No significant differences were shown between both implant designs. A good grade of osseointegration and primary/secondary stability was achieved, as well as proper maintenance of crestal bone and adequate PES/WES scores. The criteria for selection for the ideal patient for immediate implant placement is essential.
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.identifier.citation20024
dc.identifier.citationScientific Reports, nº 11
dc.identifier.citationhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-76984-5.pdf
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99218-8
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/119461
dc.languageenges
dc.relation.isreferencedbyED_IDENTRADA=1071
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPES/WES evaluationes
dc.subjectPrimary stabilityes
dc.subjectaesthetic zonees
dc.subjectdental implantses
dc.titlePrimary stability and PES/WES evaluation for immediate implants in the aesthetic zone: a pilot clinical double-blind randomized studyes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Primarystability.pdf
Size:
1.38 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Written by org.dspace.content.LicenseUtils
Download
Collections
Artículos