Publication: Sobre el tratamiento de los montañesismos en la primera edición del "Diccionario de uso del español" (1966-1967), de María Moliner.
Authors
Peña Arce, Jaime
item.page.secondaryauthor
item.page.director
Publisher
Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones
publication.page.editor
publication.page.department
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6018/ril.375171
item.page.type
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Description
Abstract
En este artículo se determina qué
léxico propio de Cantabria incluyó María
Moliner en su Diccionario de uso del español
y se compara con los ejemplos recogidos por
el DRAE-1956, fuente principal del trabajo
de la célebre lexicógrafa aragonesa. A partir
de este corpus dialectal, se estudia si el tratamiento dado a todos sus integrantes —en
cuanto a su clasificación como voces usuales
o no usuales— es coherente con los planteamientos esbozados por Moliner en los preliminares de su obra, según los cuales todo el
léxico provincial debía ser marcado como no
usual. Las conclusiones de este trabajo determinan que este tratamiento, inexplicablemente, no fue uniforme, lo que genera dudas
acerca de la coherencia del propio DUE.
In this papper, it is determined which of Cantabria’s own lexicon María Moliner included in her Diccionario de uso del español, and then a comparison is made with the examples collected in the DRAE1956, the main source of work created by the famous Aragonese lexicographer. This dialectal corpus is then examined to determine if the treatment given to all its constituent parts —in terms of its classification as usual or unusual words— is consistent with the approaches outlined by Moliner in the early part of her work, according to which, all of the provincial lexicon should be marked as unusual. The conclusions of this work determine that this treatment, inexplicably, was not monolithic, which raises doubts about the coherence of the DUE itself.
In this papper, it is determined which of Cantabria’s own lexicon María Moliner included in her Diccionario de uso del español, and then a comparison is made with the examples collected in the DRAE1956, the main source of work created by the famous Aragonese lexicographer. This dialectal corpus is then examined to determine if the treatment given to all its constituent parts —in terms of its classification as usual or unusual words— is consistent with the approaches outlined by Moliner in the early part of her work, according to which, all of the provincial lexicon should be marked as unusual. The conclusions of this work determine that this treatment, inexplicably, was not monolithic, which raises doubts about the coherence of the DUE itself.
publication.page.subject
Citation
Revista de investigación lingüística, Vol 22, 2019
Revista de investigación lingüística, Vol 22, 2019
Revista de investigación lingüística, Vol 22, 2019
item.page.embargo
Collections
Ir a Estadísticas
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/