Publication: Feedback timing and engagement with feedback. Effects on L2 written accuracy
| dc.contributor.author | Nicolás Conesa, Florentina | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cerezo García, María Lourdes | |
| dc.contributor.author | McBride, Sophie | |
| dc.contributor.department | Didáctica de la Lengua y la Literatura | |
| dc.contributor.other | Facultades de la UMU::Facultad de Educación | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-05-04T11:31:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-05-04T11:31:06Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | © 2026 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-05-04 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A substantial body of research has demonstrated the benefits of written corrective feedback (WCF) for L2 written accuracy (see meta-analyses such as Kang & Han); however, comparatively few studies have experimentally examined the effectiveness of feedback in different timing conditions or how learners engage with feedback provided at different times. Yet, understanding when feedback is most beneficial and how feedback timing shapes learners’ engagement with corrections is pedagogically essential, as it can help learners maximize their opportunities to notice and integrate corrections into their evolving L2 linguistic system. The present study employs a mixed-methods design to compare learners’ engagement with WCF and accuracy improvement under three timing conditions: (i) immediate synchronous WCF (during writing), (ii) delayed synchronous WCF, and (iii) asynchronous WCF. Twenty advanced EFL university students completed two writing tasks, processed unfocused indirect WCF, completed audio-recorded questionnaires on their engagement with WCF, and revised their texts using screencast technology to capture real-time engagement and changes in accuracy. All groups significantly improved accuracy, with no advantage for synchronous or delayed synchronous over asynchronous feedback. All participants were similarly engaged, but different patterns of engagement were found because of different feedback timing conditions. These findings suggest that advanced learners can benefit equally from different feedback timing conditions using unfocused indirect feedback. Methodological and pedagogical implications are drawn. | |
| dc.embargo.terms | 4-nov-2027 | |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.format.extent | 24 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2026, 1–23 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2026.2664200 | |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1744-3210 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0958-8221 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10201/229501 | |
| dc.language | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | |
| dc.relation | This study is part of a research programme financed by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation: Project PID2022-137544NB-I00 financed by MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ and by FEDER, EU. | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09588221.2026.2664200 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.subject | Delayed feedback | |
| dc.subject | Feedbacj timing | |
| dc.subject | Engagement | |
| dc.subject | Accuracy | |
| dc.subject | Asynchronous feedback | |
| dc.subject.ods | No relacionado con ningún objetivo de desarrollo sostenible | |
| dc.title | Feedback timing and engagement with feedback. Effects on L2 written accuracy | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion | |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication | es |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 91680073-325f-418f-9a46-37c272d767a8 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4b25ba36-da92-4329-a5dc-1d059cb8c951 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication | 4ccc15ba-d6ed-41b3-99fa-0a629c7e9eb7 | |
| relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscovery | 91680073-325f-418f-9a46-37c272d767a8 |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Nicolas Conesa, Cerezo & McBride 2026. Feedback timing and engagement with feedback.pdf
- Size:
- 1.44 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.37 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
Collections
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/