Publication:
Feedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF research agendas.

dc.contributor.authorBoggs, Jill
dc.contributor.authorManchón, Rosa M.
dc.contributor.departmentFilología Inglesa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-24T17:17:31Z
dc.date.available2024-01-24T17:17:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-26
dc.description©2023. "Once the embargo has passed this document Will be available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.” This document is the Accepted version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Assessing Writing. To access the final edited and published work see https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786es
dc.description.abstractResearch on corrective feedback (CF) has developed from its original focus on identifying which type of CF is most effective for developing L2 language learners’ grammatical accuracy to focusing on how learners use CF. Underpinning this is the assumption that learners know what to do with CF when they receive it. The concept of “feedback literacy” challenges this assumption. Carless and Boud (2018), define feedback literacy as “the understandings, capacities and dispositions needed to make sense of information and use it to enhance work or learning strategies” (p. 1316). Our intention in this paper is to reflect on the manner in which theoretical and empirical work on feedback literacy can contribute to advancing L2 written corrective feedback (WCF) research agendas. Central in our proposal is the partially under-researched aspect of experience in terms of the L2 writers’ educational background experience, particularly experience with L1 and L2 writing. We further argue that how learners were taught L1 writing and how the L1 educational culture/ society values writing can impact on how learners approach L2 writing tasks and accompanying feedback. Implications of this inclusive view of the learner for future research and pedagogy is discussed.es
dc.formatapplication/pdfes
dc.format.extent30es
dc.identifier.citationAssessing Writing, 58, 100786,
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100786
dc.identifier.issnPrint: 1075-2935
dc.identifier.issnElectronic: 1873-5916
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10201/137718
dc.languageenges
dc.relationThis paper is part of a program of research financed by the Spanish National Research Agency (Agencia Estatal de Investigación, ´Research Grant PID2019-104353GB-I00).es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293523000946?via%3Dihubes
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectFeedback literacyes
dc.subjectWritten corrective feedbackes
dc.subjectL2 writinges
dc.subjectSecond language acquisitiones
dc.subjectIndividual differenceses
dc.subjectWriting experiencees
dc.subject.otherCDU::8- Lingüística y literatura::81 - Lingüística y lenguases
dc.titleFeedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF research agendas.es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dspace.entity.typePublicationes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Boggs & Manchón 2023_Assessing Writing_Versión aceptada.pdf
Size:
838.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.26 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections