Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • Statistics
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Writing revision"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    AWE for formative purposes in the efl context: a study of multiple revisions in academic abstract writing.
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones., 2025) Rodríguez-Peñarroja, Manuel; Universitat Jaume I
    The use of automated writing evaluation (AWE) tools for writing practices has become a central issue in English as a second and foreign language teaching contexts. Researchers appear to agree that students’ positive outcomes hinge upon their integration with formative purposes. Nonetheless, few studies have addressed multiple revisions and automated feedback provision in students’ academic writing development. In this context, an instructional treatment for the integration of this technology has been designed. Explicit instruction on academic writing, AWE workshops, and practice activities remain at its core. Hence, this paper examines the effects of self- and AWE-mediated writing revisions on undergraduate learners’ academic writing performance over time and at different levels of proficiency. A series of repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were computed to study participants’ syntactic complexity, readability and language issues, and lexical diversity outcomes. Results revealed improvement in some of the dependent variables, that is, language issues reduction and increased type-token ratio mean scores, which could represent an initial step towards reconsidering the provision of automated written feedback.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback