Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • Statistics
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Video generation"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Comparison of AI-generated and human-made animated videos for medical education: experts and students preferred AI over humans
    (Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad de Murcia, 2025) Kıyak, Yavuz Selim; Coşkun, Özlem; Budakoğlu, Işıl İrem; Kaya, Abdullah Bedir; Sin departamento asociado
    Objective: This study compared medical students and experts, and evaluated a frames-to-video AI-generated problem-based learning (PBL) trigger against its scene-matched human-made animated counterpart in terms of evaluations and preferences. Study Design: A mixed-methods study was conducted at a medical school. Two scene- atched videos were used: an AI-generated video and an animated (human-made) video. Students (n=210; Years 2–5) viewed both videos in counterbalanced order and rated eight 5-point Likert items for each; they also indicated their preferred video for engagement, emotional impact, and PBL use. A multidisciplinary expert panel (n=104) evaluated only the AI video on comparable items and provided open-ended comments. Mann–Whitney-U tests compared experts with students on the AI video; Wilcoxon signed-rank tests compared students’ ratings across videos. Qualitative data nderwent thematic analysis. Results: Students rated the AI-generated video significantly higher than the animated video on all eight items (all p≤.026) and preferred it for engagement (83.8%), emotional impact (81.0%), and PBL use (79.0%). Experts’ ratings of the AI video were also high and exceeded students’ ratings on visual quality, distraction avoidance, and visual consistency (p≤.001). Qualitative themes highlighted realism, suitability for PBL sessions, and strong engagement, while suggested improvements included micro-continuity, pronunciation, and body language. Conclusion: Within the PBL context, a frames-to-video AI workflow produced a fully synthetic trigger that was preferred by students and endorsed by experts. AI-generated triggers appear feasible, acceptable, and educationally promising, provided attention is given to fine-grained audiovisual continuity and communication cues.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback