Browsing by Subject "Responsiveness"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Observational measures to evaluate parenting responsiveness: a systematic review
    (Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de Publicaciones, 2021) Halty, Amaia; Berástegui, Ana
    Objetivo: Este estudio pretende identificar y analizar las medidas observacionales para evaluar el constructo de responsividad parental, con especial atención en los componentes que se evalúan, en las características de aplicación y en los criterios de uso. Método: Se llevó a cabo una revisión sistemática de la literatura de todos los instrumentos publicados a través de las bases de datos de PsychINFO y Google Scholar. Dos investigadoras independientes evaluaron la elegibilidad de todos los instrumentos, extrajeron los datos y evaluaron sus características. Resultados: Se seleccionaron 33 instrumentos. Los componentes evaluados son diversos y más del 50% evalúan también otros constructos. La mayoría son de enfoque positivo, más de la mitad se codifican a través de vídeo y el tiempo destinado a la evaluación es muy variable, desde menos de 5 minutos a más de una hora. Algo menos de la mitad solicita realizar tareas concretas y todos ellos requieren formación específica para su uso. Discusión: Existe una gran oferta de instrumentos para evaluar la responsividad parental. Esta revisión ofrece claves que facilitan la elección del instrumento más adecuado a cada necesidad profesional o de investigación.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Embargo
    Psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) among multiple populations: a COSMIN systematic review and meta-analysis
    (Taylor and Francis Group, Taylor and Francis, 2025-01-28) Meseguer Henarejos, Ana Belén; López Pina, José Antonio; López-García, Juan José; Martínez-González-Moro, Ignacio; Fisioterapia
    Purpose: To synthesize evidence regarding psychometric properties of the Mini-Balance evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BeSTest) in assessing postural control. Method: Six databases were searched until October 15th, 2024. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality and results of studies using the COSMiN checklist and Terweés criteria. The overall quality of the evidence was provided using the modified GRADe approach. Results: Ninety-one studies were included. The Mini-BeSTest showed very good quality and sufficient structural validity (CFi: 0.91–0.99; TLi: 0.888–0.97; RMSeA: 0.05–0.45), internal consistency (α: 0.73–0.97), criterion validity (BeSTest r: 0.65–0.95), convergent validity (e.g., Brief-BeSTest r: 0.85–0.94; rs: 0.73–0.92; Berg Balance scale r: 0.58–0.85) and know-groups validity (AUC: 0.712–0.97; cutoffs: 9.0–22/28). However, the scale showed doubtful quality as well as sufficient and indeterminate reliability (inter-rater iCC: 0.56–0.998; r: 0.98; intra-rater iCC: 0.74–0.964) and measurement error (SeM: 0.45–3.03; MDC95: 1.23–8.40), respectively. Adequate quality and sufficient rating were found in most studies for responsiveness. The quality of evidence was moderate to low for structural validity and criterion validity, high to low for internal consistency, convergent validity, and high to very low for reliability, measurement error, know-groups validity, and responsiveness. Conclusions: Moderate to high quality evidence was found for support structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, hypothesis testing, and responsiveness of the Mini-BeSTest only in some study populations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Responsiveness of Wii Fit Balance Board to the change after physical therapy and rehabilitation of lower limb lymphedema following thigh liposuction
    (Universidad de Murcia, Servicio de Publicaciones, 2023) El Sayed, Dalia Galal
    The aim of this study was to measure and calculate the responsiveness of the Wii Fit Balance Board after physical therapy and rehabilitation of patients with lower limb lymphedema following thigh liposuction. The design of the study was a non – experimental, observational study. Sixty-three female patients with lymphedema following thigh liposuction, with a mean age of 51.2 years and who were undergoing physical therapy and rehabilitation, participated in this study. The Wii Fit Balance Board was used as a study instrument. Participants were asked to stand on the Wii Fit Balance Board (feet without sleeves), using skiing games for 10 seconds and 2 weeks apart after physical therapy treatment; the sixty-three patients were asked to do the same task again. The first score and second score were recorded respectively. Responsiveness of the Wii Fit Balance Board was measured by utilizing the standardized response mean (SRM) and the effect size (ES). Our study results showed that the Wii Fit Balance Board has an excellent responsiveness after physical therapy and rehabilitation of patients with lower limb lymphedema following thigh liposuction, as observed by ES and SRM values of 1.3 and 1.4 respectively. In conclusion, the Wii Fit Balance Board has a large degree of responsiveness after the physical therapy and rehabilitation program for patients with lymphedema following thigh liposuction.