Browsing by Subject "Rectal cancer"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- PublicationOpen AccessClinical Complete Response and Organ Preservation Strategies in Rectal Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Experience Clinical Complete Response and Organ Preservation in Rectal Cancer(MDPI, 2026-02-27) Encarnación, J.A. ; Ibáñez, N. ; de la Fuente, I.; González, S. ; Sánchez, M.; Bautista, Y. ; Rodríguez, C.; Nadal, J.A. ; Abellán, I. ; Montoya, M.; Ono, A. ; Carbonell, G.; Frutos, L. ; Ortiz, E.; Manso, C. ; Ruiz Carreño, Paula; Marín Vera, Miguel; Quiles, B.; Abrisqueta Carrión, Jesús; Royo-Villanova Reparaz, Carlota; Alonso Romero, José Luis; Marín-Zafra, G.; Guirao, M.; Hernández, Q.; Medicina Interna; Facultades de la UMU::Facultad de MedicinaBackground: The management of rectal cancer has evolved toward response-adapted strategies, including organ preservation in selected patients achieving a clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant treatment. However, most available evidence derives from clinical trials, and data from real-world clinical practice remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study including consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated at a tertiary referral center between January 2021 and December 2025. Baseline clinical, tumor-related, and treatment characteristics were collected. Tumor response was assessed using clinical, endoscopic, and radiological criteria. The primary endpoint was the rate of clinical complete response and the implementation of watch-and-wait strategies. Secondary endpoints included recurrence patterns and exploratory oncologic outcomes according to baseline tumor characteristics. Results: A total of 229 patients were identified, of whom 148 were evaluable for treatment response. Clinical complete response was documented in 56 patients (37.8%), and a watch-and-wait strategy was implemented in 42 patients (28.4%). Higher cCR rates were observed in patients with stage I–II disease and in tumors measuring < 4 cm on baseline magnetic resonance imaging, with cCR rates exceeding 55% in this subgroup. Tumors ≥ 4 cm showed substantially lower response rates. Clinical complete responses were observed across both short-course radiotherapy plus chemotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy regimens in patients with small tumors and early-stage disease. Tumor distance from the anal verge was not consistently associated with response. With a median follow-up of 26 months in the watch-and-wait group, five recurrences were observed, including three local recurrences. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, baseline tumor size and clinical stage were the main determinants of clinical complete response and eligibility for organ-preservation strategies in rectal cancer. Small tumors (<4 cm) showed high response rates regardless of neoadjuvant regimen. These findings support response-adapted, individualized treatment strategies and highlight the importance of tumor burden in selecting candidates for non-operative management in routine clinical practice.
- PublicationOpen AccessREG3A overexpression functions as a negative predictive and prognostic biomarker in rectal cancer patients receiving CCRT(Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Biologia Celular e Histiologia, 2024) Li, Wan Shan; Chen, Tzu Ju; Lee, Sung Wei; Yang, Ching Chieh; Tian, Yu Feng; Kuo, Yu Hsuan; Tsai, Hsin Hwa; Wu, Li Ching; Yeh, Cheng Fa; Shiue, Yow Ling; Chou, Chia Lin; Lai, Hong YueBackground. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is suggested before resection surgery in the control of rectal cancer. Unfortunately, treatment outcomes are widely variable and highly patientspecific. Notably, rectal cancer patients with distant metastasis generally have a much lower survival rate. Accordingly, a better understanding of the genetic background of patient cohorts can aid in predicting CCRT efficacy and clinical outcomes for rectal cancer before distant metastasis. Methods. A published transcriptome dataset (GSE35452) (n=46) was utilized to distinguish prospective genes concerning the response to CCRT. We recruited 172 rectal cancer patients, and the samples were collected during surgical resection after CCRT. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed to evaluate the expression level of regenerating family member 3 alpha (REG3A). Pearson's chi-squared test appraised the relevance of REG3A protein expression to clinicopathological parameters. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to generate survival curves, and the log-rank test was performed to compare the survival distributions between two given groups. Results. Employing a transcriptome dataset (GSE35452) and focusing on the inflammatory response (GO: 0006954), we recognized that REG3A is the most significantly upregulated gene among CCRT nonresponders (log2 ratio=1.2472, p=0.0079). Following IHC validation, high immunoexpression of REG3A was considerably linked to advanced post-CCRT tumor status (p<0.001), post-CCRT lymph node metastasis (p=0.042), vascular invasion (p=0.028), and low-grade tumor regression (p=0.009). In the multivariate analysis, high immunoexpression of REG3A was independently correlated with poor disease-specific survival (DSS) (p=0.004) and metastasis-free survival (MeFS) (p=0.045). The results of the bioinformatic analysis also supported the idea that REG3A overexpression is implicated in rectal carcinogenesis. Conclusion. In the current study, we demonstrated that REG3A overexpression is correlated with poor CCRT effectiveness and inferior patient survival in rectal cancer. The predictive and prognostic utility of REG3A expression may direct patient stratification and decisionmaking more accurately for those patients.