Browsing by Subject "Peri implantitis"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
- PublicationOpen AccessApical approach to the treatment of peri-implantitis in the esthetic zone: nonincised papillae surgical approach (NIPSA). Case reports(Quintessence Publishing Co, 2022-05-25) Rodríguez Moreno, José Antonio; Ruiz Ortiz, Antonio José; Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina FísicaObjective: Advanced peri-impiantitis treatment is a ciinicai challenge. Reconstructive surgery is not suggested in defects with limited bony walls and/or in those with a suprabony defect. All studies of peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery have considered a marginal surgical approach. However, in the present case report, a new apical approach is presented for the reconstruction of an advanced peri-implantitis lesion. Materials and method: First, a non-surgical phase combines prosthetic, mechanical, and chemical strategies. Second, a surgical phase combines the apical nonincised papillae surgical approach (NIPSA) with biomaterials and a connective tissue graft. Conclusion: Successful results have been obtained when using a NIPSA for the treatment of peri-implantitis, despite the unfavorable characteristics of the peri-implant defect.
- PublicationOpen AccessValidation of a novel diagnostic test for assessing the risk of Peri-Implantitis through the Identification of the microorganisms present: a pilot clinical study of Periopoc(MDPI, 2023-08-25) Moya Villaescusa, María José; Sánchez Pérez, Arturo Joaquín; Al-Lal, Nour Mehdi; Jornet García, Alfonso Felipe; Montoya Carralero, José María; Dermatología, Estomatología, Radiología y Medicina FísicaThe aim of this parallel group study was to determine the clinical applicability of a newly developed bacterial test. We evaluated the ability of the test to detect five bacteria associated with peri-implantitis: Porphyromonas gingivalis, Tannerella forsythia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, and Treponema denticola. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were established. Furthermore, by analyzing the pre-test and post-test probabilities, likelihood ratios were established, and a Fagan nomogram was constructed. As the standard, the clinical criteria of peri-implantitis adopted in the latest classification of peri-implant diseases of 2018 were used. The sample consisted of 13 patients clinically diagnosed with peri-implantitis (various implant brands) with at least 1 year of loading, of whom 11 were included in the study. The healthy group comprised 10 patients who received implants (Ticare inhex hybrid) at the university dental clinic and were monitored and exhibited no signs or symptoms of peri-implantitis during 1 year of loading. The results indicated that this test has high sensitivity and low specificity; therefore, positive results will be of great importance for a confirmatory diagnosis of peri-implantitis. However, the test is not suitable as a screening tool.