Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • Statistics
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Neuroendocrine"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Grading lung neuroendocrine tumors: Controversies in search of a solution
    (Universidad de Murcia. Departamento de Biología Celular e Histología, 2017) Pelosi, Giuseppe; Pattini, Linda; Morana, Giovanni; Fabbri, Alessandra; Faccinetto, Alex; Fazio, Nicola; Valeri, Barbara; Sonzogni, Angelica
    Background. Pathological grading of tumors is a way to measure biological aggressiveness. In lung neuroendocrine tumors (NET), grading is tautologically included into the current 2015 WHO histologic classification. Little is known, however, about alternative grading systems in lung NET. Methods. Through an extensive search of the English literature on lung NET (updated to April 2016), the following key questions were addressed: a) current concepts of grading; b) clinicians’ requests for grading; c) functional parameters for grading; d) Ki-67 labeling index (LI) for grading; e) towards an effective pathology grading system. Results. There is some room for inconsistency in the histologic classification of lung NET, likely due to the varying attribution of defining criteria. Innovative diffusion-weighted imaging upon magnetic resonance or molecular analysis could help separate indolent from aggressive lung NET, thus integrating a grading approach other than histology. Troubles in the clinical handling of metastatic or individual tumors when relying on morphology alone support the development of a lungspecific grading system for the more accurate prediction of prognosis and planning therapy in individual patients. To integrate the 2015 WHO classification using innovative grading based on Ki-67 LI, mitotic count and necrosis, a new proposal is emerging where three categories of lung NET are identified, namely Lu-NET G1, Lu-NET G2 and Lu-NET G3, which would allow tumors with similar behavior and therapy to be better handled according to their own biological potential. Conclusion. A new formulation of lung NET grading could have clinical relevance for the individual handling of patients. Key words:
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    NOL4 is a novel nuclear marker of small cell carcinoma and other neuroendocrine neoplasms
    (Universidad de Murcia, Departamento de Biologia Celular e Histiologia, 2022) Lee, Jung Hee; Shin, Dong Hoon; Lee, Sang Yull; Park, Jun Young; Kim, So Young; Hwang, Chung Su; Lee, Hyun Jung; Na, Joo Young; Kim, Jee Yeon
    Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) such as small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have characteristic histologies, but immunohistochemistry using neuroendocrine markers is still desirable to confirm diagnosis. CD56 is the most sensitive marker, but also stains various normal tissues and other tumors. Recently, we reported that nucleolar protein 4 (NOL4) is present in the blood of SCLC patients and found it was stained in the SCLC nuclei. In this study, we compared expressions of NOL4 and CD56, using 64 cases of SCLC, 18 cases of LCNEC, 6 cases of atypical carcinoid tumor, 7 cases of typical carcinoid tumor, 68 cases of lung adenocarcinoma, and 62 cases of lung squamous cell carcinoma. For primary lung NENs, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value of NOL4 were 77.5%, 95.8%, 93.2%, and 85.1%, respectively, while those of CD56 were 92.1%, 93.3%, 91.1%, and 94.1%. The specificity and PPV of NOL4 were higher than those of CD56, although the differences were not statistically significant. However, NOL4 retains its nuclear immunoreactivity in areas of crush artifact or necrosis. Furthermore, NOL4 was not expressed in adjacent normal tissues including bronchial cells and pneumocytes. Therefore, a combination of NOL4 staining with other cytoplasmic or membranous neuroendocrine markers might enhance diagnostic utility for SCLC and other NENs.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback