Browsing by Subject "Harmonized protocol"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Generating wildlife density data across Europe in the framework of the European Observatory of Wildlife (EOW)
    (Wiley, 2024-10-30) Martínez-Carrasco Pleite, Carlos; ENETWILD-consortium "et.al."; Sanidad Animal; Facultad de Veterinaria
    The European Observatory of Wildlife EOW, as part of the ENETWILD project, represents a collaborative network that has been operating since 2021 to develop and implement standardized protocols to obtain harmonized data on distribution and density of target mammal species. In so doing, the EOW aims at contributing to improving the quality of data that are available for wildlife management and risk assessment on a European scale. This report describes the activities carried out during the 2023 EOW campaign, which was joined by a total of 30 organizations who committed to collect data in 44 sites across 22 different countries. We present data on the distribution and density of three species – wild boar (Sus scrofa), European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), and red fox (Vulpes vulpes) – obtained by implementing a camera trapping protocol and by fitting the random encounter model (REM) for density estimation. Camera-trap images were processed using the Agouti platform and some of its tools specifically designed for the management of camera trapping projects. This includes the use of photogrammetry to obtain parameters for the REM directly from the sequences of images. A total of 24 EOW sites were monitored in past years as well, providing multiannual density estimates and population trends and highlighting an improvement in the precision of the estimates, related to the improved study design and protocol implementation. We also describe the activities of the 2024 campaign, carried out as part of ENETWILD 2.0, where big efforts were made to expand the network, focusing on sites at risk of African Swine Fever, with wild boar/pig interactions and containing wetlands, as potential hubs for Avian Influenza. This effort resulted in the engagement of 40 participants monitoring 64 study sites (27 countries), including 28 study sites located either in infected areas or <100km from the ASF frontline, and 25 sites with wetland habitats. Furthermore, in at least 20 sites pig farming is practised either intensively, extensively or as backyard farming. Finally, synergies were established with other international initiatives related to wildlife monitoring and disease prevention, with the aim of sharing experiences and sustaining a transnational data collection and harmonization.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Wild boar density data generated by camera trapping in nineteen European areas
    (Wiley, 2022-03-17) ENETWILD-consortium; Acevedo, P.; Aleksovski, V.; Apollonio, M.; Berdión, O.; Blanco-Aguiar, J.A.; Río Alonso, Laura del; Ertürk, A.; Fajdiga, L.; Escribano, F.; Ferroglio, E.; Gruychev, G.; Gutiérrez, I.; Häberlein, V.; Hoxha, B; Kavčić, K.; Keuling, O.; Martínez-Carrasco Pleite, Carlos; Palencia, P.; Pereira, P.; Plhal, R.; Plis, K.; Podgórski, T.; Ruiz, C.; Scandura, M.; Santos, J.; Sereno, J.; Sergeyev, A.; Shakun, V.; Soriguer, R.; Soyumert, A.; Sprem, N.; Stoyanov, S.; Smith, G.C.; Trajçe, A.; Urbani, N.; Zanet, S.; Vicente, J.; Sanidad Animal; Facultad de Veterinaria
    This report presents the results of field activities in relation to the generation of reliable wild boar density values by camera trapping (CT) in 19 areas in Europe, mainly in East Europe. Random Encounter Model (REM) densities ranged from 0.35±0.24 to 15.25±2.41 (SE) individuals/km2. No statistical differences in density among bioregions were found. The number of contacts was the component of the trapping rate that determined the coefficient of variation (CV) the most. The daily range (DR) significantly varied as a function of management; the higher values were detected in hunting grounds compared to protected areas, indicating that movement parameters are population specific, and confirming the potential role of hunting activities in increasing wild boar movement and contact rates among individual or groups. The results presented in this report illustrate that a harmonized approach to actual wildlife density estimation (namely for terrestrial mammals) is possible at a European scale, sharing the same protocols, collaboratively designing the study, processing, and analysing the data. This report adds reliable wild boar density values that have the potential to be used for wild boar abundance spatial modelling, both directly or to calibrate outputs of model based on abundance (such as hunting bags) or occurrence data. Future REM developments should focus on improving the precision of estimates (probably through increased survey effort). Next steps require an exhaustive and representative design of a monitoring network to estimate reliable trends of wild boar populations as a function of different factors in Europe. In this regard, the newly created European Observatory of Wildlife will be a network of observation points provided by collaborators from all European countries capable to monitor wildlife population at European level.