Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • Statistics
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Crop quality"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    FARMIT: Continuous Assessment of Crop Quality Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for IoT-based Smart Farming
    (Springer, 2022-03-31) Perales Gómez, Ángel Luis; López de Teruel Alcolea, Pedro Enrique; Ruiz García, Alberto; García Mateos, Ginés; García Clemente, Félix Jesús; Ingeniería y Tecnología de Computadores
    The race for automation has reached farms and agricultural fields. Many of these facilities use the Internet of Things (IoT) technologies to automate processes and increase productivity. Besides, Machine Learning and Deep Learning allow performing continuous decision making based on data analysis. In this work, we fill a gap in the literature and present a novel architecture based on IoT and Machine Learning / Deep Learning technologies or the continuous assessment of agricultural crop quality. This architecture is divided into three layers that work together to gather, process, and analyze data from different sources to evaluate crop quality. In the experiments, he proposed approach based on data aggregation from different sources reaches a lower percentage error than considering only one source. In particular, the percentage error achieved by our approach in the test dataset was 6.59, while the percentage error achieved exclusively using data from sensors was 6.71.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback