Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Biologging"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Acoustic telemetry and accelerometers: a field comparison of different proxies for activity in the marine environment
    (Oxford University Press, 2022-11-11) Venerus, L. A.; Abecasis, D.; Ciancio, J. E.; Gutiérrez Cánovas, C.; Jiménez Montalbán, Pedro Javier; García Charton, José Antonio; Pereñíguez López, José Manuel; Ecología e Hidrología
    Different proxies for activity are used in the field of acoustic telemetry, a leading technology for the study of behaviour in the aquatic environment. Acoustic telemetry poses some shortcomings that may condition data interpretation. Here, we assessed some approaches commonly used to infer activity from acoustic telemetry data using acceleration biologgers as a benchmark. Specifically, we assessed (1) the performance of internal acceleration transmitters, (2) the consequences of averaging acceleration data into increasing time bins, (3) the occurrence of sampling bias in telemetry data acquisition, and (4) the performance of the number of detections and the depth range as proxies for activity. Despite some constraints of acoustic telemetry, acceleration transmitters had a good performance. Conversely, the number of detections and the depth range did not match well the activity estimates provided by acceleration biologgers. Besides, our results pointed to some issues in models concerning the predictive power of acceleration transmitters (linear predictor) over acceleration biologgers, warned about potential sampling bias associated with data acquisition with acoustic telemetry, and highlighted the relevance of considering inter-individual differences in behavioural studies. Finally, we provided some methodological perspectives that should be considered to plan fieldwork, analyse data, and interpret results on animal activity obtained with acoustic telemetry.
  • Repository logo
    Publication
    Open Access
    Datos del manuscrito "Acoustic telemetry and accelerometers: a field comparison of different proxies for activity in the marine environment", por Pereñíguez JM, Venerus LA, Gutiérrez-Cánovas C, Abecasis D, Ciancio JE, Jiménez-Montalbán P, y García-Charton JA
    (Oxford University Press, ) Pereñíguez López, Jose Manuel; García Charton, José Antonio; Jiménez Montalbán, Pedro Javier; García Charton, José Antonio; Ecología e Hidrología
    Bases de datos utilizadas para los análisis del artículo "Acoustic telemetry and accelerometers: a field comparison of different proxies for activity in the marine environment". Existen 5 bases de datos, una base de datos para los objetivos 1, 2 y 3, y dos bases de datos para el objetivo 4, correspondientes a las series temporales corta y larga descritas en el manuscrito.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback