Repository logo
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
Repository logo

Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Murcia

Repository logoRepository logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • All of DSpace
  • Statistics
  • menu.section.collectors
  • menu.section.acerca
  • English
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Log In
    or
    New user? Click here to register.
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Subject

Browsing by Subject "Automated item generation"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Comparison of Automatic Item Generation Methods in the Assessment of Clinical Reasoning Skills
    (Universidad de Murcia. Servicio de publicaciones, 2025) Emekli, Emre; Karahan, Betül Nalan; Departamentos
    The use of automatic item generation (AIG) methods offers potential for assessingclinical reasoning (CR) skills in medical education, a critical skill combining intuitive andanalytical thinking. In preclinical education, these skills are commonly evaluated through writtenexams and case-based multiple-choice questions (MCQs), which are widely used due to the highnumber of students, ease of standardization, and quick evaluation. This research generated CR-focused questions for medical exams using two primary AIG methods: template-based and non-template-based (using AI tools like ChatGPT for a flexible approach). A total of 18 questions wereproduced on ordering radiologic investigations for abdominal emergencies, alongside faculty-developed questions used in medical exams for comparison. Experienced radiologists evaluatedthe questions based on clarity, clinical relevance, and effectiveness in measuring CR skills. Resultsshowed that ChatGPT-generated questions measured CR skills with an 84.52% success rate,faculty-developed questions with 82.14%, and template-based questions with 78.57%, indicatingthat both AIG methods are effective in CR assessment, with ChatGPT performing slightly better.Both AIG methods received high ratings for clarity and clinical suitability, showing promise inproducing effective CR-assessing questions comparable to, and in some cases surpassing, faculty-developed questions. While template-based AIG is effective, it requires more time and effort,suggesting that both methods may offer time-saving potential in exam preparation for educators.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2026 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Accessibility
  • Send Feedback