Browsing by Subject "Accelerometers"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Incidencia del género en los niveles de actividad física en las clases de educación física
    (Murcia, Universidad de Murcia, Editum, 2014) Torres Luque, Gema; Calahorro Cañada, Fernando; López Fernández, I.; Carnero, E.A.
    El objetivo principal de este trabajo, es describir los niveles de actividad física en clases de Educación Física con escolares de Educación Primaria y, observar las posibles diferencias según el género. Se selecciona-ron 42 estudiantes (22 chicos y 20 chicas) (10,5 ± 0,8 años de edad; 40,5 ± 8,3 kg de masa; 143,8 ± 7,1 cm de altura; 19,4 ± 3,2 kg/m2 de IMC) 4 y se evaluó el nivel de actividad física a través del acelerómetro GT3X (Actigra-ph, Pensacola, FL, USA) llevado durante los cinco días de la jornada escolar, en la cadera derecha, con un epoch de 1s. La intensidad de la actividad física se determinó mediante los puntos de corte de Evenson et al. (2008). Los resultados muestran que los alumnos realizan actividad física a intensidad moderada y vigorosa en torno a 17% y 13% para chicos y chicas respectiva-mente, no observándose diferencias significativas estadísticamente
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Open Access
    Monopodal postural stability assessment by wireless inertial measurement units through the fast fourier transform
    (Human Kinetics, 2019-10-18) Pino Ortega, José; Hernández Belmonte, Alejandro; Gómez Carmona, Carlos David; Bastida Castillo, Alejandro; García Rubio, Javier; Ibañez, Sergio José; Pino Ortega, José; Actividad Física y Deporte
    Objectives: The aims of the present study were: (i) to describe the FFT multi-joint as monopodal postural stability measurement in well-trained athletes, (ii) to compare the withinsubject FTT between laterality, joints and body segments, and (iii) to establish the within and between-subject relationship between joints. Methods: Twelve national-level basketball players participated voluntarily in this investigation. The participants performed two 60-second repetitions of a monopodal stability test (one repetition with each lower limb), separated by three minutes of active recovery. All tests were recorded by four WIMU PROTM inertial devices located on the ankle, knee, lumbar spine and thoracic spine. The main variable was total acceleration (AcelT), where the Fourier Transform (FFT) was applied. Results: The higher instability results were found in the ankle and in the non-dominant lower limb (dominant=1.136±0.81 a.u.; non-dominant=1.169±.108 a.u.). In the body segment analysis, the greater percentage of differences (%diff) were shown between lumbar spine and knee in the dominant (%diff=-2.989%; d=0.87) and non-dominant lower limb (%diff=-3.243%; d=0.90). Finally, great between-subjects variability was found in all joints and body segments. Conclusions: The described protocol is proposed for monopodal postural stability assessment, being useful to provide information about the stability of joints and the body segment between joints. Besides, a within-subject analysis is recommended and the FFT calculation will enable a linear analysis of each test .